Legal Opinion

Consolidated Distilled Products, Inc. v. Mahin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1974No. 45454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

This case involves an attack upon the Illinois Liquor Control Act which, after it was amended in 1953, imposed a privilege tax upon the distributors of wine made from grapes grown in Illinois at a lower rate than the rate at which that tax was imposed upon distributors of wine made from grapes grown outside of Illinois or from other fruits. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 43, par. 158.) The plaintiffs, who assert the invalidity of the statute generally and as so amended, are distributors of wine made from products other than grapes grown in Illinois. They sue on their own behalf and on behalf of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Department of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Richardson Lubricating Co. v. KinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Mutual Tobacco Co. v. HalpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Consolidated Distilled Products, Inc. v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Midway Tobacco Co. v. MahinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Schlessinger v. OlsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Estate of Carey v. Village of StickneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API