Estate of Carey v. Village of Stickney
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski
Plaintiffs, the estate of Thomas Carey and Suburban Downs, Inc., conduct, respectively, horse- and hamessracing meets in the defendant village of Stickney under licenses issued by the Illinois Racing Board. Plaintiffs brought this declaratory judgment action, seeking the invalidation of a 1974 Stickney tax ordinance which requires racetrack licensees to pay 10 cents to Stickney “for each person entering the grounds or enclosures of the licensee upon a ticket of admission” (Stickney Municipal Code of 1965, ch. 18A, sec. 18A.02). The ordinance allows but does not require licensees to collect…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Winter v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Mulligan v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Paper Supply Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- S. Bloom, Inc. v. KorshakIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Isberian v. Village of GurneeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Schlessinger v. OlsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Milwaukee Safeguard Insurance Co. v. SelckeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Milwaukee Safeguard Ins. Co. v. SelckeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.