Legal Opinion

Estate of Carey v. Village of Stickney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1980No. 52064PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

Plaintiffs, the estate of Thomas Carey and Suburban Downs, Inc., conduct, respectively, horse- and hamessracing meets in the defendant village of Stickney under licenses issued by the Illinois Racing Board. Plaintiffs brought this declaratory judgment action, seeking the invalidation of a 1974 Stickney tax ordinance which requires racetrack licensees to pay 10 cents to Stickney “for each person entering the grounds or enclosures of the licensee upon a ticket of admission” (Stickney Municipal Code of 1965, ch. 18A, sec. 18A.02). The ordinance allows but does not require licensees to collect…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Winter v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mulligan v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Paper Supply Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. S. Bloom, Inc. v. KorshakIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Isberian v. Village of GurneeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Schlessinger v. OlsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Milwaukee Safeguard Insurance Co. v. SelckeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Milwaukee Safeguard Ins. Co. v. SelckeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API