Legal Opinion

Halvorsen v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1998No. C027036PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

An at-will employee is terminated and sues his manager, alleging the manager intentionally interfered with the employment relationship by wrongfully inducing the employer to terminate him. Under such circumstances, we conclude the manager has an absolute privilege against liability for inducing the termination of the employee. We also conclude the employer is not liable for breach of contract or of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We therefore affirm the judgment in this case in favor of the employer and the manager.

Facts and Procedure

Plaintiff Boyd M.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Metoyer v. ChassmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Easton v. Sutter Coast HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. McGrory v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Bionghi v. Metropolitan Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API