State v. Altman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the admission into evidence of the marijuana alleged to have been seized from defendant. Defendant contends that admission of this evidence was error because the affidavit on which the search warrant was based was insufficient and because no voir dire examination was conducted prior to the admission of this evidence.
Defendant argues that the supporting affidavit does not contain sufficient facts to support the issuance of a search warrant.
G.S. 15-25 provides that a search warrant may be issued by any of the specified judicial officers' upon a finding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. MoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ConnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. NixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. McKoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.