Legal Opinion

State v. Orton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 18, 1995No. 9401-40386; CA A84481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for violating a court-issued stalking protective order (SPO). ORS 163.750 (since amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 353, § 7). We reverse that conviction.

On September 24, 1993, the circuit court issued an SPO pursuant to ORS 163.738(3) (since amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 353, § 4), which provided:

“(3) (a) The circuit court may enter, after personal or telephonic appearance by the petitioner, a court’s stalking protective order if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that:
“(A) The person, without legitimate purpose, intentionally, knowingly or recklessly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Mix v. NewlandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. CrenshawOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. Norris-RomineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Pyle v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Truesdell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API