Legal Opinion
State v. Orton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 18, 1995No. 9401-40386; CA A84481PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for violating a court-issued stalking protective order (SPO). ORS 163.750 (since amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 353, § 7). We reverse that conviction.
On September 24, 1993, the circuit court issued an SPO pursuant to ORS 163.738(3) (since amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 353, § 4), which provided:
“(3) (a) The circuit court may enter, after personal or telephonic appearance by the petitioner, a court’s stalking protective order if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that:
“(A) The person, without legitimate purpose, intentionally, knowingly or recklessly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Mix v. NewlandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CrenshawOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. Norris-RomineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State ex rel. Pyle v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Truesdell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013