The H. & S. No. 3.
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Admiralty. Suit by the Chesley Tug & Barge Company and the Corsby Towboat Company against the scow H. & S. No. 3, the Harper Barge & Lighterage Company, claimant, and C. A. Bailey, with N. M. Nelson intervening libelant.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
[1] On the 25th day of January, 1916, the claimant, sole owner of scow H. & S. No. 3, for a cash consideration of $2,400, payable monthly at the rate of $100 per month, chartered the scow to the Bailey Transportation Company of Seattle. It was provided in the charter party agreement that certain improvements should be made upon the scow by the lessee at its expense, and it ivas further provided that the lessee should save the claimant, owner, “harmless from any and all claims resulting from maritime accidents, collisions, stranding, or damage by the scow to other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Knott v. Botany MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.