Powers v. Motor Wheel Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Dissent
Under the statute, loss of an eye means loss of the sight or vision of the eye. Rye v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 229 Mich. 39. No specific award is allowable for partial loss of an eye, but such an injury is compensable only under the general provisions of the law and if it reduces earning capacity. Hirschkorn v.Fiege Desk Co., 184 Mich. 239. However, loss of an eye does not require total loss of sight. Where sight is destroyed to the extent that no vision useful in industry remains, the eye is lost, even though some sight continues. But if any vision useful in industry remains, the eye is not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cline v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Weaver v. Maxwell Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Hirschkorn v. Fiege Desk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Purchase v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Liimatta v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.