Legal Opinion

Annadall v. Union Cement & Lime Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1905No. 20,622PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Prom Clark Circuit Court; Perry E. Bear, Special Judge. Action by John W. Annadall against the Union Cement & Lime Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover for personal injuries suffered by him while in the service of appellee.

1. The theory of the complaint is that appellant, while in the employ of appellee, was directed by the latter to leave temporarily the work he was employed to perform, and to assist in other work not within the scope of his employment, and that while so engaged he re*111ceived the injuries complained of and that the same were caused by the negligence of appellee. Appellant’s complaint was based upon the doctrine declared in Brazil Block Coal Co. v. Hoodlet (1891), 129 Ind. 327;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tuthill Corp., Fill-Rite Division v. WolfeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. StalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API