Legal Opinion
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1987No. C3-86-99PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The court of appeals ruled that day care rules adopted by the Department of Human Services (formerly Department of Public Welfare) were invalid because the department acted in excess of its statutory authority and failed to comply with certain statutory procedures. We conclude the department acted properly and reverse.
Effective April 1,1985, revised rules governing family and group family day care homes, referred to collectively as Rule 2, 1 were adopted by the Department of Human Services. In January 1986, petitioners, who are aggrieved day care providers, brought this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sevcik v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. McKownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Elbers v. GroweCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.