Legal Opinion

Hope v. Linden Park Blood Horse Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On error to the Union County Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*628The opinion of the court was delivered by

The Chancellor.

The judgment reviewed is in an action upon contract brought by the Linden Park Blood Horse Association to recover from James W. Hope the sum of $5,000 paid by it to him in August, 1893, as hereinafter stated, in which the defendant pleaded the general issue.

The case was tried before the judge at Circuit without a jury-

Errors are assigned upon refusals of the judge to nonsuit and to admit and consider the defence that the money sued for was paid to Mr. Hope in pursuance of a corrupt and illegal agreement.

The plaintiff below proved that it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nellis v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Inhabitants of Worcester v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Harrison v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Smith v. Hubbs Administrator of HubbsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1833

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Hoffman v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  4. Bodenhofer v. HoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Mayor of Rutherford v. Hudson River Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API