Bodenhofer v. Hogan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Jones District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, ■ Judge. Action brought by plaintiff, a deputy sheriff of Jones County, to recover from defendant, the sheriff of that county, an amount alleged to be due as compensation for performing the duties of deputy under appointment for the year 1906. There was a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $72, admitted by defendant to be due, and a judgment for defendant for costs. Plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.
The statutory provision relating to the appointment and compensation of deputy sheriffs is: That each sheriff shall in writing appoint one or more deputies from whom he shall require a bond, which appointment and bond shall’be approved by the officers having the approval of the principal’s bond, and such appointment may be revoked in writing, all appointments and revocations to be filed and kept in the auditor’s office-; that the hoard of supervisors shall fix the number of deputies and the salary of each, and “the chief deputy shall he paid by the sheriff out of the compensation allowed Him…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Satterlee v. . Board of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Kehn v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Emmitt v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Buck v. Hawley & HoopsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Gallaher v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hamilton v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Crutcher v. Johnson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Hicks v. Stillwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Taylor v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Werner v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.