Legal Opinion
Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1973No. Nos. 26542, 26543PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
Weber Basin Water Conservancy District and other applicants for interven*582tion have taken this appeal from a final order1 of the District Court denying their applications to intervene in the action below brought by the State of Utah.
That action was brought May 18, 1969,2 as a class action against appellees, alleging a Sherman Act conspiracy in the sale of concrete and steel pipe and seeking treble damages with respect to purchases of those products. The State of Utah purported to represent a class described as “those public bodies and agencies of state and local…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Flanagan v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1977
- State of Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Company, Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, Applicants for Intervention-Appellants. State of Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Company, Salt Lake County Cottonwood Sanitary District, Applicants for Intervention-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Cunningham v. INS. CO. OF NORTH AMER.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Cunningham v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987