Legal Opinion
Stull v. Bayard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1977No. 75 Civ. 3782PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff for an order (a) determining that this action may be maintained as a class action (Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(1)) and (b) granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff (Fed.R.Civ.P. 56), determining that defendants are liable to plaintiff.
There are three cross-motions: (a) by defendants Howard Piper, Thomas F. Piper, and William T. Piper, Jr.; (b) by defendant Bangor Punta Corporation (“Bangor”); and (c) by defendant The First Boston Corporation (“First Boston”). The cross-motions are for summary judgment in favor of the moving defendants,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Klein v. BowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stull v. BayardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH, CITRONELLE v. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Stull v. BayardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Pavlak v. ChurchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.