Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1946No. 5746PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE, Justice.

The appellees, Ed Hoover, Jr., and Eva-leen Henson, a single woman, brought this suit as plaintiffs against appellant, L. H. Puckett, as defendant, for the purpose of quieting title to a one-half interest in the minerals in a section of land in Lipscomb and Ochiltree Counties. The appellant in turn sought to quiet title in himself to a ■one-fourth interest in the minerals in the same section. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellees, quieting their title to one-half of the minerals in the land and denying any relief to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Langley v. NorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Mason v. PetersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Bell v. RuddTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Schoellkopf v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Evans v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Puckett v. HooverTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Jones v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Grossman v. LiedekerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Jones v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API