Legal Opinion

People v. Payne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1902No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Muskegon; Russell, J. Charles Payne was convicted of seduction.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The respondent was convicted of the crime of seduction. He has brought the case here on exceptions before judgment. The errors assigned may be grouped: First, errors in the admission and rejection of testimony; second, the language, conduct, and instructions of the trial judge; third, the language of the prosecuting attorney upon the trial and in his address to the jury. We have considered all the assignments of error, but will discuss only part of them.

The prosecution were allowed to show that prosecutrix’s mother was insane, and her father did not care for her after she was 14 years of age.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Boyce v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. People v. CahoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Webber v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. People v. HaveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API