People v. Lange
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Muskegon. (Dicker-man, J.) Despondent was convicted of embezzlement. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The respondent was convicted of embezzlement under an information containing five counts, covering a period of six months each, while in the employ of one Lyman G. Mason, as his clerk and book-keeper.
We will consider the questions raised, stating in connection therewith so much of the record as is necessary to their proper understanding.
1. Two jurors were challenged as incompetent because' they were justices of the peace. This question has been disposed of at the present term of Court, and such jurors held competent.1 The exemption is a privilege personal to the jurors, and not the subject of…
2Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. BlodgettOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. KolowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.