State v. Snyder
Supreme Court of Missouri
•Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court . — Eon. O’Neill Ryan, Judge. (1) The indictment, in its change that since the twenty-second day of March, 1898, defendant had not been an inhabitant of or usually resident within the State of Missouri, states a legal conclusion and not primary facts, and is indefinite and uncertain as to whether the defendant is charged with not being an inhabitant of the State of Missouri during that period, or is charged with not being usually…
Read the full summary
•Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court . — Eon. O’Neill Ryan, Judge. (1) The indictment, in its change that since the twenty-second day of March, 1898, defendant had not been an inhabitant of or usually resident within the State of Missouri, states a legal conclusion and not primary facts, and is indefinite and uncertain as to whether the defendant is charged with not being an inhabitant of the State of Missouri during that period, or is charged with not being usually resident within the State during that period. R. S. 1899, secs. 2419 and 2421; 21 Ency. Plead, and Prac., 649; Bishop on…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
On the fifth day of April, 1902, the defendant was indicted by the grand jury of the city of St. Louis for bribery of an officer, to-wit, a member of the Municipal Assembly of said city. The indictment, omitting caption, is in the words following:
“The grand jurors of the State of Missouri, within and for the body of the city of St. Louis, now here in court duly impaneled, sworn and charged, upon their oath present: That on (or about) the twenty-second day of March in the year one thousand, eight hundred and ninetyreight the said city of St. Louis was a municipal corporation in the said State…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State v. FairlambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Traxler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- State v. ShulsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- State v. TiedtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Commonwealth v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.