Legal Opinion

Ex parte Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1921No. 24PublishedCited by 34 opinions

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. ’ The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, commonly called the Rock Island, filed in this court a petition in which it allegéd that the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, was undertaking to proceed against it personally in a suit therein pending; that the Rock Island had not voluntarily become a party to the suit, had not been served with process, and could not under § 51 of the Judicial *275Code be made a party without its consent, since it was organized under the laws of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. In Re CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. Forman, Judge. Slick Airways, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API