Legal Opinion
Perry v. Money
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 31, 2007No. 1:05 CV 2737PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Petitioner Clarence Perry filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 asserting the trial court violated his rights to the constitutional protections of the Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Under the Fourth Amendment, Petitioner claims the search of his car and person was illegal. Pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, Petitioner believes he was denied a full and fair hearing. Finally, Petitioner argues his Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when the Government failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cvijetinovic v. EberlinDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Smith v. PetkovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Stalnaker v. BobbyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008