Legal Opinion
Handley-Mack Co. v. Godchaux Sugar Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1924No. 4037PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error (hereinafter called plaintiff) is a New York corporation, doing business at New Orleans, La., and engaged in the manufacture, refining and sale of sugar. Plaintiff in error (hereinafter called defendant) is a Tennessee corporation, engaged in the wholesale grocery business at Chattanooga. Plaintiff brought this suit claiming damages of more than $9,000, for the breach of a contract made April 23, 1920, for the sale by plaintiff to defendant of 600 barrels of granulated sugar at 25 cents per pound, 200 barrels to be shipped each month during July,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- William H. Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Frederick A. Hurley and Christine A. Hurley v. Motor Coach Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Korea Exchange Bank, New York Branch v. Trackwise Sales Corp. Moo Sung Ko and Young S. Ko.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.