Cleveland, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.
The appellant company relocated its railroad from a point two miles south of Zionsville to a point four miles northwest of that town, for the alleged purpose of eliminating dangerous curves, inconvenient grades and serious errors in location, as provided by §5248 Burns 1914, Acts 1907 p. 373, and filed its complaint for the appropriation of that part of the *677proposed new right of way which extends across appellee’s farm. Appraisers were appointed and made an award, to which each party filed exceptions, and the question of damages was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Chicago & Great Southern Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Shields v. PylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. StefaniakIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. PattenIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. First Trust & Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. BrubeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.