Legal Opinion

Williams v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 8, 1978No. Docket No. 3589-74UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

During the taxable years 1964 to 1969, inclusive, petitioners, husband and wife, as officers and majority shareholders of three family-owned corporations, withdrew large sums of corporate funds for their personal use, which were entered on the corporate books as accounts receivable and notes receivable. Notes were not issued until May 1967 for some, but not all, withdrawals. Notes were not issued until August 1969 for the remainder.

Read the full summary

During the taxable years 1964 to 1969, inclusive, petitioners, husband and wife, as officers and majority shareholders of three family-owned corporations, withdrew large sums of corporate funds for their personal use, which were entered on the corporate books as accounts receivable and notes receivable. Notes were not issued until May 1967 for some, but not all, withdrawals. Notes were not issued until August 1969 for the remainder. No interest was paid until after August 1969. A third party note was given the corporations by petitioners as repayment for the withdrawals after a reorganization…

1Opinion of the Court

C. F. WILLIAMS AND JEANNE V. WILLIAMS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Williams v. Commissioner

Docket No. 3589-74.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1978-306; 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 206; 37 T.C.M. (CCH) 1270; T.C.M. (RIA) 78306;

August 8, 1978, Filed

During the taxable years 1964 to 1969, inclusive, petitioners, husband and wife, as officers and majority shareholders of three family-owned corporations, withdrew large sums of corporate funds for their personal use, which were entered on the corporate books as accounts receivable and notes receivable. Notes were not…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  3. Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Gene O. Clark and Faye Clark v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Fred M. Archer and Evie B. Archer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ralph D. Crowley and Frances A. Crowley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, Dynamo, GP, Inc., Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API