Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Barnhart
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 16, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2005-2093Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTINE HICKS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 05-2093 (CKK) v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 16, 2010) Plaintiff Christine Hicks brings this action seeking review of the final administrative decision by Defendant Michael J. Astrue, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”),1 denying Plaintiff’s claim for Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSIB”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Jerome MAZIARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.