Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Crawford
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 24, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Robert M. Tucker and Lottie M. Tucker, and Defendants, Garfield Crawford and Lillian E. Crawford, have filed cross motions for summary judgment under Civil Rule 56.
The facts, pertinent to the present motions, are not in dispute. Defendants were the owners of property located at 923 Lombard Street, Wilmington, Delaware, and of the dwelling house situated thereon. An agreement was entered into between the Plaintiffs and Defendants for the sale of the property and house to the Plaintiffs, and settlement was held on June 22, 1972. Seven days thereafter, on June 29,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Kline v. BurnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Old Town Development Company v. LangfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Koval v. PeoplesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
- SPALLONE v. SiegelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Longwood Homes, Inc. v. New Castle CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.