Legal Opinion

Koval v. Peoples

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 29, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

I

Defendants contracted to construct a house for plaintiffs on a lot in Rolling Meadows, New Castle County, Delaware. The lot was not serviced with public water, and the contract provided that defendants would provide a well. According to the complaint, defendants delivered possession of the house together with the well, septic tank and other auxiliary systems to plaintiffs on August 29, 1975. The complaint alleges that the water produced by the well was polluted and contaminated by hardness, salts, iron, minerals, dissolved solids, bacteria, turbidity and discoloration and that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tips v. Hartland Developers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Conklin v. HurleySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Hunter Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
  5. C & F Maintenance & Property Management, Inc. v. Eliason & Knuth Drywall Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API