Legal Opinion

CROSLAND v. VAUGHN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 2019No. 2:03-cv-01459Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS CROSLAND : Petitioner, : : CIVIL ACTION v. : NO.: 03-1459 : DONALD T. VAUGHN, et al., : Respondents. : MEMORANDUM JONES, II J. October 31, 2019 I. INTRODUCTION Presently before this Court is a motion filed pro se by Curtis Crosland (“Petitioner”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Petitioner seeks reconsideration of this Court’s Order dated September 14, 2018 (ECF No. 81)1 and seeks relief from the 2003 denial of his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254.2

Relying on Reeves v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API