Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Seattle Taxicab Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1912No. 9895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered May 13, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the Court

Mount, .J.

Defendant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. There is no substantial dispute upon the following facts: In May, 1909, the defendant corporation occupied a building in Seattle, in which building the corporation kept and repaired a number of automobiles. This building was occupied by defendant as a tenant from month to month. Mr. A. C. Stevens was in active charge of the building, and was designated by the president of the company as superintendent. He had authority to employ and discharge such men as were needed about the business. On May 1, 1909, Mr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Livieratos v. Commonwealth Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brace v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atholwood Development Co. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Parker v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kitzmiller v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Canadian Collieries (Dunsmuir), Ltd. v. HumphreyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API