Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 16, 1985No. Civ. N-84-338 (PCD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
The defendant, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), moves for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust the grievance resolution procedures required by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 153 First and Second (“RLA”), and because plaintiff’s suit for wrongful discharge is time-barred by virtue of the holding in DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151,103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 276 (1983).
Facts
The plaintiff, Scott Montgomery, worked as a Trackman at Amtrak’s New Haven…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carrion v. Enterprise Ass'n, Metal Trades Branch Local Union 638Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Paul McKee and Thomas Husted v. Transco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Gregory v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Schaub v. K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Carrion v. Enterprise AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.