Legal Opinion

Leete & Lemieux, P.A. v. Horowitz

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 31, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] James L. Horowitz and Oxford Aviation, Inc. (collectively, Horowitz) appeal, pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 5945(1)(C) (2011),1 from a judgment entered in the District Court (Portland, Moskowitz, J.) confirming the award of a Fee Arbitration Panel (Panel), M. Bar R. 9, in favor of Leete & Lemieux, P.A. (L & L). Horowitz argues that the court (1) was required to vacate the arbitration award because the Panel allegedly determined that it did not have power to decide whether L & L’s claim was time-barred, and (2) erred in confirming the award because it remained within the trial court’s authority…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacOmber v. MacQuinn-TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Kurtz & Perry, P.A. v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. Schindler v. NilsenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Anderson v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  5. Jackson v. BorkowskiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James G. Stanley Jr. v. Michael A. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. Xpress Natural Gas, LLC v. Cate Street Capital, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API