Legal Opinion
Panda Herbal International, Inc. v. Luby (In Re Luby)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2010No. 94-16098PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Chief Judge. Introduction
In this adversary proceeding, the Plaintiffs seek two measures of relief: first, that the Debtors be denied their discharge or, alternatively, that the Plaintiffs’ claims be excepted from any discharge which the Debtors might be granted. The Debtors oppose both requests and after lengthy, acrimonious pre-trial discovery, a trial was held over four days.
Summary 1
Based on the factual findings made herein, the Court will enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs denying the Lubys a discharge pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 727(a). Alternatively,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Beard Research, Inc. v. Kates (In re Kates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Carto v. Oakley (In re Oakley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Blackwell Oil Co. v. Potts (In re Potts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Symonies v. Sobol (In re Sobol)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Stephens v. Morrison (In Re Morrison)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.