Cook v. Southern Bonded, Inc.

JOHNSON, Judge.

We note at the outset that although plaintiff did not properly note exceptions and assignments of error in accordance with Rule 10, N.C. Rules App. P., plaintiff did present for review by properly raising in her brief the question whether the judgment appealed from is supported by the findings of fact and conclusions of law as provided in Rule 10(a), N.C. Rules App. P. Our scope of review will be limited accordingly.

The sole question presented by plaintiff for review is whether the Commission erred in dismissing her claim for additional benefits for the reason that her request…