Legal Opinion

State v. Shanklin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1908No. 7642PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Snell, J., entered June 22, 1908, dismissing a prosecution for keeping a gambling resort, after sustaining a demurrer to the information.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

— Respondents were prosecuted upon an information which, omitting the formal parts, was as follows;

“That the said George Shanklin, Frank Moon and William Quinn, in the county of Pierce, in the state of Washington, on or about the third day of April, nineteen hundred and eight, and at divers times before said date, wilfully and unlawfully did own, run, maintain, operate, keep and he in charge of a certain public house and place of resort within the city of Tacoma, county of Pierce, and state of Washington, then and there being known as Tacoma Turf Exchange, and numbered 1213% Pacific avenue,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WeithoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. AyersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Randolph v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Swigart v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Wellston Kennel Club v. CastlenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. State v. FrederickIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API