Interstate Power Co. v. Forest City
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
— The nature of the action is as stated in the preceding preliminary statement. The appellees contending, (1) that the special election for the establishment of a municipal electric plant did not carry by a sufficient majority; (2) that the voters were fraudulently induced to vote in favor of the establishment of the electric plant; (3) that the construction contracts were invalid because there was a substantial variance between the plans and specifications submitted to the voters, resulting in noncompetitive bidding; (4) that the form of ballot used at the election was misleading; and (5)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Wyatt v. Town of ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Detroit United Railway v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Abbott v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- James Petrozello Co., Inc. v. Chatham Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Poor v. Incorporated Town of DuncombeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Lahn v. PrimgharSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- McGrory v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF MUN. ELEC. UT.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.