Legal Opinion
James Petrozello Co., Inc. v. Chatham Tp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 22, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
75 N.J. Super. 173 (1962)
182 A.2d 572
JAMES PETROZELLO COMPANY, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM, ETC., PETER ROSELLE & SONS CO., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 11, 1962.
Decided June 22, 1962.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. John R. Miller argued the cause for appellant Township of Chatham, etc.
Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for appellants Peter Roselle & Sons, et al. (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).
Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. McCarter &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Waszen v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Camden Plaza Parking, Inc. v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Armaniaco v. CresskillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal Electric Corporation v. FasiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- J. TURCO PAVING CON. v. City Council of OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Suburban Disposal, Inc. v. Township of FairfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Dugan Const. Co., Inc. v. NJ Turnpike Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Cardell, Inc. v. Township of MadisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.