Legal Opinion

United States v. Corwin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 4, 1889No. 123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. At law, on a- contract. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs sued out this writ of error. The case is stated in. the opinion-.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamae

On the 17th of November, 1883, the plaintiffs in error brought suit in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas against the defendants in error, Dennis Corwin and John Cardwell, as sureties in two bonds, one in the penal sum of $3000, and the other, $2150, given by one Edwin P. Phillips, to secure the faithful performance of two contracts, dated May 20, 1881, between Phillips and these plaintiffs. Phillips being without the jurisdiction of that Court, was not sued. By one of these contracts Phillips agreed to furnish to the quartermaster’s department, United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clifton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. United States v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Inman Bros. v. Dudley & Daniels Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. United States v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Powell v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Peysert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906
  5. Haworth v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API