Legal Opinion
Lohm v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1978No. 3-378A73PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal in which defendant-appellant Arthur R. Lohm contends that the offenses of incest, as defined by IC 1971, 35-1-82-1 (Burns Code Ed.), and sodomy, as defined by IC 1971, 35-1-89-1 (Burns Code Ed.), were repealed on July 1,1977 by the provisions of the new criminal code 1 and that, therefore, the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information charging him with having committed those offenses on September 30, 1977.
After the trial court denied the motion to dismiss, appellant filed a Petition to Certify Judgment to the Indiana Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. White v. Grant Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Cain v. GodaIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Sudbury v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Jonhs v. GavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C. v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Board of Trustees Hamilton v. LandryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Roland v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Banton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.