Legal Opinion

Williams v. International Paper Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1982No. Civ. 20239PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether an employee may bring a civil action against his employer for injuries caused by the employer’s intentional failure to correct hazardous working conditions when it knew that an injurious explosion was substantially certain to occur. We hold that such an action is barred by the “exclusive remedy” limitation of the workers’ compensation act (Lab. Code, § 3200 et seq.)

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a “charge operator” in the “old power house” at its mill facility at Weed. He was severely injured in the course of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Meyer v. Graphic Arts International UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bouley v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Richardson v. GAB Business Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Iverson v. Atlas Pacific EngineeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Denny's Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API