Legal Opinion
Loadholt v. South Carolina State Budget & Control Board
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 14, 2000No. 3116PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge:
This declaratory judgment action involves interpretation of a general tort liability policy issued by the Insurance Reserve Fund to Hampton County. The circuit court found the policy covered sexual misconduct and related offenses allegedly committed by Isiah Rudy Loadholt against three employees while he was Sheriff of Hampton County. We reverse.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Sherry Capers, Tounda Taylor, and Kim Davenport (collectively “Respondents”) filed three separate actions in the United States District Court against Hampton County and Sheriff Loadholt. They alleged Loadholt…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. FerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frazier v. BadgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Padgett v. South Carolina Insurance Reserve FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Doe v. Dorchester School District TwoDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- John Doe v. Palmetto Pee Dee Behavioral Health; Universal Health Services, Inc.; and UHS of Delaware, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2026