Luth v. Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jaelcson Circuit Court. — Hon. Wm. 0. Thomas, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.
This action was brought for salary alleged to be due plaintiff as chief clerk in the water department of the defendant city.' The judgment in the trial court was for the plaintiff and the city appealed.
It seems that on the 10th of June, 1910, P. C. Folk was appointed chief clerk in the office of Assessor and Collector of Water rates for Kansas City, Missouri. His appointment was made in the manner prescribed by what is called the new charter of Kansas City adopted in 1908. That charter provided for civil service com missioners with rules, governing appointment to office.
Under the provisions…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dolan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- State ex rel. Worrell v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Gracey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- State ex rel. Evans v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- People ex rel. Sartison v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Surety & Insurance v. HintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Rundberg v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Cunio v. Franklin CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Schulte v. City of JeffersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Irwin v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.