Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Jefferson County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1934No. 6 Div. 494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Though there is an irreconcilable conflict in the decided cases, yet the weight of authority is’ to the effect that payment of a salary of an office to a de facto incumbent discharging its duties exonerates the government or political body from the payment thereof to the de jure officer. Such conclusion rests in the main upon the broad ground of public policy. The authorities are collated in the note to Hittell v. City of Chicago, 55 A. L. R. 994, and 43 C. J. 688. This court in Walden v. Town of Headland, 156 Ala. 562, 47 So. 79 (properly interpreted by the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mattox v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Andrews v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  3. State ex rel. Worrell v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gracey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Henry v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Godby v. HagerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Parker v. Jefferson County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Flack v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. Rice v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API