Legal Opinion

Bachow Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 6, 2001No. 99-1346, 99-1347, 99-1360 to 99-1365, 99-1391 to 99-1394 and 99-1533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

The issues in these consolidated eases center on the Federal Communications Commission’s conversion of its system for awarding licenses in the 39 GHz (gigahertz) band from a comparative application process to a public auction. The 39 GHz band, comprising the 38.6 to 40.0 GHz frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum, appears to have attracted little commercial interest until the mid-1990s, when newly developed technology became available. Until late 1995, the Commission processed non-mutually exclusive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Jem Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Gayla Joy Hendren, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. James v. Hurson Associates, Inc. v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Directv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. The Florida Institute of Technology v. Federal Communications Commission, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Folden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. New Jersey Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API