Legal Opinion
State v. Burleigh County
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdzell., Ch. J.
In December, 1919, Nestor Rutanen borrowed from the Bank of North Dakota $2,500, securing the loan by a mortgage given on a quarter section of land owned by him in Burleigh county. In regular course the mortgage was assigned to the treasurer of the state of North Dakota as security for bonds of the real estate series issued by the State. Hutanen did not pay the taxes on the land for the years 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923, and at the tax sale, there being no bidders, the laird was struck off to the county and a tax certificate issued. In 1923, Hutanen being in default, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Harriman v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- First American Bank & Trust Company v. EllweinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. Divide CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Idaho Falls v. PfostIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- County of Madison v. School District No. 2Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.