Legal Opinion

Kevin Flood v.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 1, 2015No. 15-1311UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Kevin Flood petitions pro se for a writ of mandamus to compel the Attorney General of the United States and the Director of the United States Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility to investigate and criminally charge various individuals allegedly involved in tampering with audio surveillance tapes used in his underlying criminal case. We will, deny the petition.

The foregoing action is Flood’s third mandamus petition in this Court related to the allegedly altered tapes. In 2007, we denied Flood’s request to order officials to investigate this matter. In re…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Flood v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. FloodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Kevin Patrick Flood v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kevin Flood v. Charles SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API