Legal Opinion
Kevin Patrick Flood v.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 3, 2012No. 12-3115UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Kevin Patrick Flood has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking that we vacate an interlocutory order of the District Judge entered in his civil rights action, and that his case be reassigned to a different District Judge and different Magistrate Judge. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.
Flood, while awaiting trial in federal court on drug and weapons charges, filed a civil rights action, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by certain members of…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Flood v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Kevin Flood v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015