Legal Opinion
Ballas v. Woodin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiff, after obtaining a certificate of registration from the state police as a junk dealer, pursuant to General Statutes § 21-10, 1 orally applied to the named defendant, as first selectman of the town of Kent, for a license to operate a junk-yard business within the town limits. General Statutes § 21-11. When it appeared to the plaintiff that his application would not be favorably acted upon, he initiated the present mandamus action against the three defendants in their capacity as the board of selectmen of Kent. The specific relief sought by the plaintiff was a writ of mandamus…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Heimov v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Pluhowsky v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- State v. VachonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Waterbury Teachers Assn. v. FurlongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Lechner v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Light v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Simmons v. BuddsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.