Legal Opinion

True's Oil Co. v. Keeney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1969No. 39307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Respondent, True’s Oil Company, brought this suit as a class action on behalf of itself and other creditors similarly situated, seeking to recover debts claimed due from the officers and directors of East Side Mint Distillers, Inc., a bankrupt corporation, hereafter re ferred to as East Side. Defendants R. E. Keeney and his wife, Mary, were both directors and served, respectively, as president and secretary-treasurer of East Side from its formation in December, 1960, until their resignation from all positions in the corporation in October, 1961. Defendant-appellant, Clarence Davis 1 was, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hatley v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Royer v. MaibWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wheelock v. HaskellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  5. Scharf v. HarstadWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harding v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Artz v. O'BANNONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API