Legal Opinion

Scharf v. Harstad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1963No. 36311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

— This appeal resulted from the trial court granting a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s action for failure of the amended complaint to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The plaintiff (appellant), a court-appointed receiver of an insolvent corporation, brought this action against the defendants (respondents), the officers and directors of the corporation, pursuant to RCW 23.01.080, for incurring business debts without complying with subsection (c) thereof, which requires the filing of an affidavit with the County Auditor stating that the amount of capital stock with which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sherwood v. Moxee School District No. 90Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Royer v. MaibWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. True's Oil Co. v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API