Legal Opinion

Nachand v. Seaman

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 28, 1971No. Civ. No. 71-283-MPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

Opinion and Order

In this habeas corpus proceeding petitioner, a sergeant in the United States Army, seeks a discharge from the Army as a conscientious objector. The Army, pursuant to Department of Defense Directive No. 1300.6, has issued Army Regulation No. 635-20 (hereafter A.R. 635-20), the latest version thereof being dated July 31, 1970, effective August 15, 1970, which sets forth the policy, criteria, and procedures for disposition of army personnel who, by reason 0f « * * * deeply held moral, ethical or religious belief * * claim conscientious…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Logemann v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. KANAI v. GerenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  3. United States v. PhilpotDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. Singer v. Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API