Nachand v. Seaman
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
Opinion and Order
In this habeas corpus proceeding petitioner, a sergeant in the United States Army, seeks a discharge from the Army as a conscientious objector. The Army, pursuant to Department of Defense Directive No. 1300.6, has issued Army Regulation No. 635-20 (hereafter A.R. 635-20), the latest version thereof being dated July 31, 1970, effective August 15, 1970, which sets forth the policy, criteria, and procedures for disposition of army personnel who, by reason 0f « * * * deeply held moral, ethical or religious belief * * claim conscientious…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Logemann v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- KANAI v. GerenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- United States v. PhilpotDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Singer v. Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974