In re the Claim of Naylor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. The contract between employer and union provided for vacation pay scale based on length of service. It did not give employees a right to a vacation as such, but to vacation pay. It provided that when operations of the company permitted closing of the plant “all vacations will be taken” then. The record shows that the union indicated to the employer by letter addressed “To Whom it May Concern” that it wanted a closing period for vacations, i.e., a “closing time” during a specified period. This cannot be construed other than as a…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Texas Employment Commission v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Claim of Chichipas v. Western Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- In re KariszekiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Harmon v. LaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.