Byrum v. Horning
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
We granted certiorari in this matter in order to highlight the amendment to Rule 2-601, “Entry of judgment,” that became effective October 1, 1997. 24 Md. Reg., Issue 9, Friday, Apr. 25, 1997, at 650. The amended rule reads as follows (brackets indicate deletions from prior rule; italics indicate additions to prior rule):
“(a) [When Entered] Prompt Entry — Separate Document
“Each judgment shall be set forth on a separate document. Upon a general verdict of a jury or upon a decision by the court allowing recovery only of costs or a specified amount of money or denying all relief,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Falcinelli v. CardasciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hiob v. Progressive American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. KirsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. RichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- URS Corp. v. Fort Myer Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.